Last Friday (05/03/13), U.S. President
Barack Obama gave a speech at the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico
City during which he highly praised the great socio-economic progress currently
taking place in that country. While much
of Mexico’s mainstream press reported positively on the bilateral meetings
between Obama and his counterpart, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, and lauded
Obama’s speech, the U.S. media took a different slant, fueled primarily by an article
in the Los Angeles Times, “Obama sings Mexico's praises, but some Mexicans hear
flat notes” (http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-mexico-obama-reaction-20130503,0,2714566.story).
The Times story was picked up by wire services and became the dominant view of
the speech in the U.S. media. It included numerous quotes, such as:
“‘[That was] a really good speech by
President Obama, but what Mexico was he talking about?’ said Jose Carlos Cruz,
24, a graduate student in international relations.”
“Alberto Rios Lara, 26, who is studying
to be an economist, said, ‘Obama is a great speaker; it's really impossible not
to feel excited. However, the reality is different in Mexico. We need more
action and fewer speeches.’"
The two major issues in U.S.-Mexico
relations are drug trafficking and illegal immigration. Obama’s words can be
interpreted as a call for Mexicans to stay at home in Mexico, a position that
echoes the sentiments of Peña Nieto. The latter wants to showcase how the
return to power of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI – Partido Revolucionario Institucional)
has brought economic growth and stability to Mexico. At the same time, Peña
Nieto has stepped back on cooperative ventures with U.S. law enforcement in the
area of drug trafficking, trying to foster an image of self-sufficiency.
Nevertheless, Peña Nieto has to worry about the collateral effects of any U.S.
economic slowdown and how it could affect Mexico’s growth. As primary trading
partners, both the U.S. and Mexico have vested interests in shoring up their
mutual commerce. According to the Mexican newspaper El Universal, there’s cause
for concern in Mexico that a slowing U.S. recovery will adversely impact Mexico
(http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/921054.html).
The paper reported that in 2012, the U.S. economy grew by 2.2% annual rate,
compared to 1.8% in 2011. Nevertheless, the last quarter showed signs of
weakening, dropping from 3.1% in the third quarter to -0.1% in the fourth. The
article claims that this slowing will hurt Mexico’s GDP, whose 3.9% growth in
2012 is projected to slow to 3.5% this year. This is why Peña Nieto’s
government was so enthusiastic about Obama’s cheerleading, releasing a
statement that “both governments are committed to working to make the North
American region the most competitive and dynamic in the world,” according to a
spokesperson for the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP - Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público).
This is reflected in the opening address of the SHCP Minister, Luis Videgaray,
at the G24 press conference in Washington, D.C. on April 18, 2013. Videgaray
indicated emphasized, “This means that we still face very important challenges
starting out with the crisis, financial imbalances, fiscal imbalances that
create relevant risks for G24 countries. We need to, in parallel, push forward
a pro-growth productivity-based agenda” (http://www.shcp.gob.mx/SALAPRENSA/doc_discurso_funcionarios/secretarioSHCP/2013/lvc_conferencia_g24_ing.pdf).
In spite of Obama’s and Peña Nieto’s
expressed optimism in Mexico’s social and economic outlook, the very real
specter of violence, poverty and death haunts U.S.-Mexico relations. The drug
cartel wars now stretch across the entire length of the shared border, leaving
tens of thousands dead annually. This violence together with rampant poverty
push thousands more to seek opportunities in the U.S. With post-9/11 tightened
security, most people entering the U.S. illegally risk their lives crossing
through extreme desert environments. The NGO Humane Borders has compiled a map
of confirmed fatalities in southern New Mexico. It reports 2,269 deaths from
10/01/99-03/28/12 (http://www.humaneborders.net/warning-posters/).
These are the realities that will
require serious cooperation, and not just speeches, on both sides of the line in
the sand.
No comments:
Post a Comment